by Peter Finch
As incidents of Filipino citizens flying to the United States or other countries and not returning home pile up, government and the foreign embassies were prompted to implement stricter measures in issuing visas.
When a foreigner crosses cultures just to acquire a Filipina bride, he has to go through numerous hassles, like complying with mountains of paperwork, spending hundreds of dollars and waiting for a long time before he can finally take his Filipina bride to his country. Processing the requirements for a fiancee or spouse visa takes time and the length of the waiting time depends on where you live.
You can either apply for a fiancee visa (K1 Fiancee Via) or a spouse visa (IR-1) for your Filipina bride, but you still have to comply with several requirements. There are many specialized lawyers that can help you with this. The law requires that you and your Filipina girlfriend must have been legally free to marry and if your girlfriend is granted a fiancee visa, you have to marry her within 90 days after arrival in your own country.
You may need to show documents to prove your relationship with your Filipina girlfriend so keep track of those emails you exchanged with each other, letters, photos, plane tickets and any other proof that you have a relationship going on.
To obtain a spouse visa for your Filipina bride, first of all you must get married so you can petition your Filipina wife to migrate to your own country. If you get married in the Philippines, you must comply with all the requirements of applying a marriage certificate and getting married whether in the church or civil ceremony.
You must not forget to bring important documents if you want to get married in the Philippines, like your US passport, an Affidavit from the US Embassy, a divorce decree or spouse's death certificate if you were previously married, proof that you have informed your parents if you are 22 to 24, or proof of parental consent if you are 18 to 21 years old. These are needed in filing for a marriage license. Your marriage must be authentic and valid under the Philippine laws, and only then can you file a petition to get a visa for your Filipina wife.
Here is a brief run on the procedures of acquiring a spouse visa. After you return to your own country, you should file a petition with the nearest office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) where your place of residence is covered. The INS will in turn send the papers to your Filipina bride for her to comply. You and your Filipina bride must return all required forms to the National Visa Center, who will in turn forward all of the documents to the US Embassy, including your Affidavit of Support.
Your Filipina bride will then have to wait for an interview with the consular officer in your Embassy who will determine if she will be issued a visa or not. If you join bride tours, they will take care of all the visa processing and immigration procedures but if you came on your own, you and your Filipina fiance will have to do the petitioning or applying of her visa.
About the Author
Check out our reviews of all of the top filipina dating web sites at Filipina Dating Review. Don't get scammed. Read our hard hitting and totally honest reviews of the top 20 filipina dating web sites on the internet. You'll be glad you did. Visit now.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Thursday, September 20, 2007
The V visa to spouses and minor children
by Anirban Bhattacharya
V visa is a temporary visa available to spouses and minor children (unmarried and under 21years of age) of U.S. lawful permanent residents or green card holders. The V visa has been especially formulated by the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act of 2000 (LIFE Act) to allow permanent residents of the U.S. to stay with their spouses and children while the immigration process proceeds.
Who all are eligible for the V visa?
To qualify for the V visa an individual:
Must be the spouse or minor child of a lawful permanent resident of the USA
Must be the beneficiary of an immigrant petition filed not after 21 December, 2000
Those living in the USA o Should be waiting for I-130, or o In possession of I-130, however, the beneficiary must be waiting for an immigrant visa number, or o Must have a pending application for adjustment of status or an applicant for an immigrant visa
Those living outside the USA
o Must have been waiting for an immigrant visa number for at least 3 three years o Must be still waiting for an immigrant visa interview
The V visa however, does not take in account whether the beneficiary is waiting for the approval of the I-130 or an F2A visa. In other words, with the V visa, a nuclear family can stay in unity. Moreover, spouses holding the V visa can get employment while children can go to school as long as the underlying immigration petition is valid. Moreover, v visa also allows international travel.
The V visa, however, is no longer useful since December 21, 2000. Since the date it was announced ineffective, more than 1,000,000 spouses and minors are waiting for immigrant visas without being allowed to live with their spouses/parents in the U.S.
However, non-immigrants including students, specialty workers, intra-company transferees do not have this kind of problem as their spouses and minor children automatically qualify for dependent visas and there are no numerical limits or processing delays associated with dependent visas. The current laws of immigration in US only disallow permanent residents to live in unity.
However, U.S. citizens do not experience major delays either when bringing their spouses and or minor children is concerned. All they have to do is file the I-130 applications for their dependants. Alternatively, they can also apply for a K visa if the process takes longer than usual.
The other similar area of interest is Second Passport, Diplomatic passport immigration, Economic citizenship program, Diplomatic passport, investment immigration, Second citizenship program.
About the Author
Myself webmaster of http://www.geraldassociates.com/ dealing in services Second Passport, Second Citizenship, Instant citizenship, Independent immigration, Diplomatic passport, Diplomatic passport services, Diplomatic passport immigration, Economic citizenship program, Diplomatic passport.
V visa is a temporary visa available to spouses and minor children (unmarried and under 21years of age) of U.S. lawful permanent residents or green card holders. The V visa has been especially formulated by the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act of 2000 (LIFE Act) to allow permanent residents of the U.S. to stay with their spouses and children while the immigration process proceeds.
Who all are eligible for the V visa?
To qualify for the V visa an individual:
Must be the spouse or minor child of a lawful permanent resident of the USA
Must be the beneficiary of an immigrant petition filed not after 21 December, 2000
Those living in the USA o Should be waiting for I-130, or o In possession of I-130, however, the beneficiary must be waiting for an immigrant visa number, or o Must have a pending application for adjustment of status or an applicant for an immigrant visa
Those living outside the USA
o Must have been waiting for an immigrant visa number for at least 3 three years o Must be still waiting for an immigrant visa interview
The V visa however, does not take in account whether the beneficiary is waiting for the approval of the I-130 or an F2A visa. In other words, with the V visa, a nuclear family can stay in unity. Moreover, spouses holding the V visa can get employment while children can go to school as long as the underlying immigration petition is valid. Moreover, v visa also allows international travel.
The V visa, however, is no longer useful since December 21, 2000. Since the date it was announced ineffective, more than 1,000,000 spouses and minors are waiting for immigrant visas without being allowed to live with their spouses/parents in the U.S.
However, non-immigrants including students, specialty workers, intra-company transferees do not have this kind of problem as their spouses and minor children automatically qualify for dependent visas and there are no numerical limits or processing delays associated with dependent visas. The current laws of immigration in US only disallow permanent residents to live in unity.
However, U.S. citizens do not experience major delays either when bringing their spouses and or minor children is concerned. All they have to do is file the I-130 applications for their dependants. Alternatively, they can also apply for a K visa if the process takes longer than usual.
The other similar area of interest is Second Passport, Diplomatic passport immigration, Economic citizenship program, Diplomatic passport, investment immigration, Second citizenship program.
About the Author
Myself webmaster of http://www.geraldassociates.com/ dealing in services Second Passport, Second Citizenship, Instant citizenship, Independent immigration, Diplomatic passport, Diplomatic passport services, Diplomatic passport immigration, Economic citizenship program, Diplomatic passport.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Immigration to the United States
Immigration to the United States of America is the movement of non-residents to the United States, and has been a major source of population growth and cultural change throughout much of the American history even though the foreign born have never been more than 16% of the population since about 1675. The economic, social and political aspects of immigration have caused controversy regarding race, ethnicity, religion, economic benefits, job growth, settlement patterns, impact on upward social mobility, levels of criminality, nationalities, political loyalties, moral values, and work habits. As of 2006, the United States accepts more legal immigrants as permanent residents than the rest of the world combined. [7]
Given the distance of North America from Eurasia, most historical U.S. immigration was a risky venture, which inspired myths and dreams of prosperity and opportunity not found in the Old World. Since the advent of international jet travel in the 1960s, travel to the United States has been made easy by plane, but remains difficult, expensive and dangerous for some illegally crossing the Mexican border at unauthorized points.
Immigration boomed to a 57.4% increase in foreign born population from 1990 to 2000. The public started to focus on existing immigration law and immigration outside the law, especially the 7.5+ million illegal alien workers with 12+ million household members already inside the U.S. and another 700,000 to perhaps more than 850,000 predicted for each coming year. At issue was whether the immigration laws and enforcement system were working as the public wanted them to work. Illegal household members from Mexico alone were estimated at over 8 million. [8].
Proposals were put forward to criminalize illegal immigrants, to build a barrier along some or all of the 2,000-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico, and to create a new guest worker program. Throughout most of 2006, the country and Congress saw itself immersed in a debate about these proposals. As of March 2007, few of these proposals had become law, though a partial border fence was approved.
Given the distance of North America from Eurasia, most historical U.S. immigration was a risky venture, which inspired myths and dreams of prosperity and opportunity not found in the Old World. Since the advent of international jet travel in the 1960s, travel to the United States has been made easy by plane, but remains difficult, expensive and dangerous for some illegally crossing the Mexican border at unauthorized points.
Immigration boomed to a 57.4% increase in foreign born population from 1990 to 2000. The public started to focus on existing immigration law and immigration outside the law, especially the 7.5+ million illegal alien workers with 12+ million household members already inside the U.S. and another 700,000 to perhaps more than 850,000 predicted for each coming year. At issue was whether the immigration laws and enforcement system were working as the public wanted them to work. Illegal household members from Mexico alone were estimated at over 8 million. [8].
Proposals were put forward to criminalize illegal immigrants, to build a barrier along some or all of the 2,000-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico, and to create a new guest worker program. Throughout most of 2006, the country and Congress saw itself immersed in a debate about these proposals. As of March 2007, few of these proposals had become law, though a partial border fence was approved.
Thursday, September 14, 2006
Immigration - Canada Employment Immigration
This article provides useful, detailed information about Canada Employment Immigration.Both the birth and death rates in Canada are on the decline. As a result, the young and skilled population is in short supply. To offset this situation, the government of Canada has loosened its immigration policy to allow immigrants from other countries to settle in Canada and work for its growth and prosperity. The Canadian government encourages skilled and self-employed persons, investors, businessmen, entrepreneurs and farmers to permanently settle in Canada to boost its economy.
Among the categories of immigrants who are welcome to seek employment in Canada, the skilled workers with good qualifications and plenty of experience are the most welcome. Several types of programs are available for skilled persons.
The Canadian government has laid down six criteria for which you or your spouse must earn sufficient points in order to be considered eligible for immigration. Skilled and educated persons should have knowledge of English or French. They should have work experience of at least 10 years, including one year\'s worth of full-time paid work in their field. The Canadian National Occupational Classification has set up certain Skill Types and Skill Levels to classify skilled workers. To qualify for immigration, the applicant must be in Skill Type 0 or Skill Level A or B.
Besides the skills, you should also possess sufficient funds to settle and manage your business. You should also be able to transfer your skills to others and at the same time generate jobs. The government of Canada is ready to offer employment chances to about 116,000 in various categories of skilled persons, entrepreneurs and self-employed persons in the year 2005-2006.
Besides the employment immigration offered by the government of Canada, the provincial government of Quebec also offers immigration for employment under its Quebec Immigration Service, which it shares with the government of Canada. A person with the right qualifications and experience with no health and security problems may be considered for employment.
In addition to the above categories, there is a Federal Self-Employed Program in cultural activities and athletics
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Canada Immigration Visas provides detailed information on Canadian Immigration, Canada Immigration Visas, Canada Immigration Lawyers, Canada Employment Immigration and more. Canada Immigration Visas is affiliated with Canadian Immigration.
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
Advising on the most up-to-date advice with reference to immigration laws.
When you are trying to find
better-quality
information about immigration laws,
you'll find it easier said than done
extricating superior advice
from ill-advised immigration laws
suggestions and advice
so it is important to know
ways of judging the information you are offered.
Here's a few pieces of advice
which we believe you should use
when you're seeking information about immigration laws.
Understand that
the guidance we offer you
is only pertinent to web based information about immigration laws.
We do not give you
any guidance or advice
for researching in 'real world' situations.
An excellent piece of advice to follow
when you are presented with
information and suggestions on a immigration laws
web is to research who is behind the website.
This may show you who owns the site immigration laws
authority
The quickest way to work out who owns the immigration laws
website is to look on the 'contact' page or 'about this site' information.
All decent sites providing information on immigration laws,
will nearly always have a 'contact', or an 'about', page
which will list the site owner's details.
The details should tell you
some advice
about the owner's necessary expertise.
This permits you to make an informed assessment
about the webmaster's depth of experience,
to provide advice to you regarding immigration laws.
About the author:
Tom Brown is the webmaster at data-info-broadcast.info
better-quality
information about immigration laws,
you'll find it easier said than done
extricating superior advice
from ill-advised immigration laws
suggestions and advice
so it is important to know
ways of judging the information you are offered.
Here's a few pieces of advice
which we believe you should use
when you're seeking information about immigration laws.
Understand that
the guidance we offer you
is only pertinent to web based information about immigration laws.
We do not give you
any guidance or advice
for researching in 'real world' situations.
An excellent piece of advice to follow
when you are presented with
information and suggestions on a immigration laws
web is to research who is behind the website.
This may show you who owns the site immigration laws
authority
The quickest way to work out who owns the immigration laws
website is to look on the 'contact' page or 'about this site' information.
All decent sites providing information on immigration laws,
will nearly always have a 'contact', or an 'about', page
which will list the site owner's details.
The details should tell you
some advice
about the owner's necessary expertise.
This permits you to make an informed assessment
about the webmaster's depth of experience,
to provide advice to you regarding immigration laws.
About the author:
Tom Brown is the webmaster at data-info-broadcast.info
Immigration - Business Immigration: Good Idea Or Bad?
Canada's Business Immigration Plan is a plan started by the Canadian Government to attract experienced people with money in order to boost the Canadian economy.Prospective immigrants must have a net worth of at least $800,000 and must make an investment of $400,000 in the Canadian economy.
There are 3 classes of Business Immigrants, each with separate eligibilty requirements.
Investors The Immigrant Investor Program (IIP) wants to find experienced business persons and their capital to Canada. The Immigrant Investors must demonstrate business experience and a legally obtained minimum net worth of CAN $800,000, and must make an investment of $400,000 in the Canadian economy. Entrepreneurs The Entrepreneur Program is searching for experienced business persons who will own and actively manage businesses in Canada that contribute to the economy and create jobs. Entrepreneurs must demonstrate business experience and a minimum legally obtained net worth of CAN $300,000, and are subject to conditions upon arrival in Canada.
Self-employed persons The Self-Employed Persons Program seeks to attract applicants who have the intention and ability to become self-employed in Canada. Self-employed persons are required to have either (a) relevant experience that will enable them to make a significant contribution to the cultural or athletic life of Canada, or (b) experience in farm management and the intention and ability to purchase and manage a farm in Canada.
The province of Quebec operates its own immigrant investor program. All investors in the Quebec program must both be destined to live in Quebec and selected by Quebec. Between 1986 to 2000 most Business Immigrants were from Hong Kong, 7,678 or 39.91% of the total number of Business Immigrants.
How effective has this program been in creating jobs and in bringing investment to Canada? According to Statistics Canada 2000 figures were; full time jobs created 1832, part time jobs created 918.
Canada has an underpopulation problem and has found itself in the same situation as Japan and many European countries. It should actively promote immigration because there is a diminished fertility rate just like in most European countries and Japan.
In Japan things are so bad that only 14% of its population is under the age of 15.
One solution, starnge though it may sound, is to end abortion. Some observers say that if abortions in Canada halted, the population numbers would be above replacement levels within a year.
At present there are 3 categories of Immigrants to Canada: Skilled Worker: This category is for professionals and skilled tradespeople with at least one year of continuous work experience.
This class is the most popular class and is also known as the professional class or skilled worker class and the application is assessed based on a point system. An individual should make an application under this class if he/she wishes to come to Canada based on his/her qualifications, work experience and knowledge of the English or French language. Special provisions apply for immigration to Quebec
Business Class: This category is for managers and business owners with high net worth, and requires an investment in Canada.
This class is also known as the business immigration class. One should make an application under the entrepreneur class and self-employed class if he/she wishes to start a business in Canada. A person should make an application under the investor class if he/she DOES NOT wish to start a business in Canada.
Family Sponsorship: This category is for citizens and permanent residents of Canada who want to sponsor a close family member.
Pierre Trudeau changed Canada's immigration laws and opened wide the country's doors to Africans, Asians and West Indians as part of an attempt to fill its huge, underpopulated hinterland.
The result is that today eighteen percent of the population is now foreign-born compared with about 11 percent in the United States, with little or no debate over whether the effects of such change in culture, demographics and national identity is good or bad.
Only in the last 10 years or so have Calgary, Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, with one third of the population, become multicultural polyglots, with the towers of Sikh temples and mosques becoming mainstays of the skylines and cuisines and fashion becoming concoctions of spices and patterns that are in the vanguard of globalization.
One of the advantages of this cultural diversity is that the population has become more like Europe and has become more tolerant of different views than the United States. However, gun-related crimes in the major cities are increasing at an alarming rate.
About the author:
Busines s Immigration, good or bad? by J Schipper
Monday, September 04, 2006
Canadian Family Class Immigration - One way of Immigrating to Canada
One way you can your family can join you in Canada as immigrants is through family class immigration. Through family class immigration, certain members of your family are allowed to immigrate to Canada, upon your promise that you will take care of them for a specified period of time.
This article is a summary of some important aspects of family class immigration. It is not legal advice, but rather is merely informational. It is accurate as of October 16, 2005.
Who can come to Canada?
Members of your family who may be eligible to come to Canada through the family class immigration program include your husband, your wife, or your conjugal partner, which includes your same-sex partner. In addition, your mother, your father, your grandparents, and your children may also be eligible. Additional members of your family, including your brother, sister, niece, nephew, or grandchildren may be eligible to join you in Canada as immigrants in some cases.
What do I need to do?
Before your family members can join you in Canada, you need to meet certain qualifications. Importantly, you must be eighteen years of age or more, and a Canadian citizen or a Canadian permanent resident. You must be residing in Canada if you are a permanent resident; in some cases Canadian citizens may be residing outside of Canada but remain eligible to sponsor their family members to immigrate to Canada.
You must also fill out a sponsorship undertaking. This is your promise to the Canadian government that you will support the family members you are sponsoring. Depending on the situation, this promise will endure for between three and ten years. You and the family members you are sponsoring must also sign an agreement which states that all parties understand their obligations.
In many cases sponsors must meet minimum financial requirements. The government established these financial requirements to help ensure that sponsors have the means to support their families in Canada. An important exception to financial requirements is that in cases of spousal sponsorship, the government generally does not take your financial situation into consideration.
What other ways are there to immigrate to Canada?
There are many ways to immigrate to Canada. Immigrating through the family class is just one of those routes.
In addition, it is possible to come to Canada on a temporary work, visitor, or study visa.
What are the chances of successfully immigrating to Canada?
Between January and March 2005, approximately 56,374 non-Canadians became permanent residents, which is the first step to becoming a Canadian citizen. Of this number, 12,412 were in the family class.
About the Author
Sat-Sung Kalman is a Canadian immigration lawyer, specializing in Canadian immigration, visitor, study, and work permits.
Written by: Sat-Sung Kalman
This article is a summary of some important aspects of family class immigration. It is not legal advice, but rather is merely informational. It is accurate as of October 16, 2005.
Who can come to Canada?
Members of your family who may be eligible to come to Canada through the family class immigration program include your husband, your wife, or your conjugal partner, which includes your same-sex partner. In addition, your mother, your father, your grandparents, and your children may also be eligible. Additional members of your family, including your brother, sister, niece, nephew, or grandchildren may be eligible to join you in Canada as immigrants in some cases.
What do I need to do?
Before your family members can join you in Canada, you need to meet certain qualifications. Importantly, you must be eighteen years of age or more, and a Canadian citizen or a Canadian permanent resident. You must be residing in Canada if you are a permanent resident; in some cases Canadian citizens may be residing outside of Canada but remain eligible to sponsor their family members to immigrate to Canada.
You must also fill out a sponsorship undertaking. This is your promise to the Canadian government that you will support the family members you are sponsoring. Depending on the situation, this promise will endure for between three and ten years. You and the family members you are sponsoring must also sign an agreement which states that all parties understand their obligations.
In many cases sponsors must meet minimum financial requirements. The government established these financial requirements to help ensure that sponsors have the means to support their families in Canada. An important exception to financial requirements is that in cases of spousal sponsorship, the government generally does not take your financial situation into consideration.
What other ways are there to immigrate to Canada?
There are many ways to immigrate to Canada. Immigrating through the family class is just one of those routes.
In addition, it is possible to come to Canada on a temporary work, visitor, or study visa.
What are the chances of successfully immigrating to Canada?
Between January and March 2005, approximately 56,374 non-Canadians became permanent residents, which is the first step to becoming a Canadian citizen. Of this number, 12,412 were in the family class.
About the Author
Sat-Sung Kalman is a Canadian immigration lawyer, specializing in Canadian immigration, visitor, study, and work permits.
Written by: Sat-Sung Kalman
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Banishing Immigration Newspeak
For nearly thirty years, Michigan's Lake Superior State
University has released an annual List of Banished Words, a brief
inventory of the year's most annoyingly popular expressions, with
the recommendation they be "banished from the Queen's English for
mis-use, over-use and general uselessness."
This year, the tiresome "metrosexual" and the insufferable "bling
bling" were deservedly condemned, as were several war-inspired
entrants such as "embedded journalist" and "smoking gun." I was
disappointed that none of my three choices for this annual
dishonor made the cut, however. My nominees for banishment were:
"Guest worker program," "Matching willing workers with willing
employers," and the worst offender, "Work Americans won't do," as
in "our economy needs illegal immigrants because they do work
Americans won't do."
Combined, these three Orwellian phrases are calculated to convey
the impression that there are certain occupations so inherently
dangerous or otherwise disagreeable that we lazy, self-indulgent,
American crybabies must rely on hardy immigrant stock to roll up
their sleeves and get the job done for us. Tell that to a
Pennsylvania coal miner!
Although it's true that less glamorous jobs are frequently filled
by illegal aliens, the jobs themselves are not intrinsically
unacceptable. Rather, the ready supply of illegal labor has
resulted in many perfectly satisfactory jobs becoming
unacceptable. In short, illegal aliens will work under unsanitary
and unsafe conditions for minimum wage or even less, thereby
lowering standards, and as long as employers can fill jobs by
exploiting illegals, there will simply be no incentive to improve
wages or working conditions.
A recent piece by Nancy L. Othón and Mike Clary in the South
Florida Sun-Sentinel illustrates this principle in action with
the story of Gregorio Ruiz Aviles and Lauro Marquez Hernandez,
two young Mexican illegal alien construction workers crushed to
death in the collapse of a three-story building on which they
were working. Five other men were injured in the accident. The
Florida company which employed them was fined $2.4 million for
having no workers' compensation insurance, but according to Othón
and Clary, "five months after the deaths of Ruiz and Marquez, few
public officials, employers, workers and immigrant advocates
express much hope that change would come soon in an industry
where undocumented workers willingly take any job they can get."
Worse still, employers who play by the rules are easily underbid
by their unscrupulous rivals, and the downward pressure on wages
and safety intensifies. And this phenomenon is certain to worsen
-- not lessen -- under any program which would legalize the
process. Why? Because a "documented" worker is easier to deport,
and will therefore be more likely to do "work Americans won't do"
to avoid unemployment and ineligibility. A guest worker program
will therefore simply institutionalize the current gray market
for employees who will tolerate the intolerable.
It's a tenuous doctrine, that American workers are so expensive
that even American companies can't afford them, and the plan to
extricate ourselves from this invented predicament by pinning our
hopes on the newly legendary Mexican work ethic is flimsier
still. And yet, there is some evidence that muddleheaded
Americans are being persuaded by the hypnotic repetition of
immigration Newspeak issuing from the White House, the Congress,
and the major news media. A February 2004 Gallup Poll found that
46% of Americans support President Bush's plan to legalize
Mexican nationals currently living here illegally, "as long as
they hold jobs that no U.S. citizen wanted to do."
George Orwell famously observed that political speech is
"designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and
to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." What else can be
said of a phrase such as "undocumented worker" which presupposes
the subject is working, and transmutes the violation of our
borders into an apparent paperwork mixup? Will we now refer to a
bank robbery as an "unauthorized withdrawal?" And what shall we
call the children of undocumented workers? Undocumented students?
Orwell forewarned us more than fifty years ago that sloppy
language begets foolish thinking -- and vice versa -- and it's as
true today as ever. Purposely misleading expressions such as
"work Americans won't do" are solid proof that big lies still fit
neatly into short phrases.
It's time we banished them.
About the Author
Mr. Salientian is a regular contributor to PHXnews.com. You can read more of his articles on politics, economics, trade and immigration at HotFrog.org.
Written by: G. Salientian
University has released an annual List of Banished Words, a brief
inventory of the year's most annoyingly popular expressions, with
the recommendation they be "banished from the Queen's English for
mis-use, over-use and general uselessness."
This year, the tiresome "metrosexual" and the insufferable "bling
bling" were deservedly condemned, as were several war-inspired
entrants such as "embedded journalist" and "smoking gun." I was
disappointed that none of my three choices for this annual
dishonor made the cut, however. My nominees for banishment were:
"Guest worker program," "Matching willing workers with willing
employers," and the worst offender, "Work Americans won't do," as
in "our economy needs illegal immigrants because they do work
Americans won't do."
Combined, these three Orwellian phrases are calculated to convey
the impression that there are certain occupations so inherently
dangerous or otherwise disagreeable that we lazy, self-indulgent,
American crybabies must rely on hardy immigrant stock to roll up
their sleeves and get the job done for us. Tell that to a
Pennsylvania coal miner!
Although it's true that less glamorous jobs are frequently filled
by illegal aliens, the jobs themselves are not intrinsically
unacceptable. Rather, the ready supply of illegal labor has
resulted in many perfectly satisfactory jobs becoming
unacceptable. In short, illegal aliens will work under unsanitary
and unsafe conditions for minimum wage or even less, thereby
lowering standards, and as long as employers can fill jobs by
exploiting illegals, there will simply be no incentive to improve
wages or working conditions.
A recent piece by Nancy L. Othón and Mike Clary in the South
Florida Sun-Sentinel illustrates this principle in action with
the story of Gregorio Ruiz Aviles and Lauro Marquez Hernandez,
two young Mexican illegal alien construction workers crushed to
death in the collapse of a three-story building on which they
were working. Five other men were injured in the accident. The
Florida company which employed them was fined $2.4 million for
having no workers' compensation insurance, but according to Othón
and Clary, "five months after the deaths of Ruiz and Marquez, few
public officials, employers, workers and immigrant advocates
express much hope that change would come soon in an industry
where undocumented workers willingly take any job they can get."
Worse still, employers who play by the rules are easily underbid
by their unscrupulous rivals, and the downward pressure on wages
and safety intensifies. And this phenomenon is certain to worsen
-- not lessen -- under any program which would legalize the
process. Why? Because a "documented" worker is easier to deport,
and will therefore be more likely to do "work Americans won't do"
to avoid unemployment and ineligibility. A guest worker program
will therefore simply institutionalize the current gray market
for employees who will tolerate the intolerable.
It's a tenuous doctrine, that American workers are so expensive
that even American companies can't afford them, and the plan to
extricate ourselves from this invented predicament by pinning our
hopes on the newly legendary Mexican work ethic is flimsier
still. And yet, there is some evidence that muddleheaded
Americans are being persuaded by the hypnotic repetition of
immigration Newspeak issuing from the White House, the Congress,
and the major news media. A February 2004 Gallup Poll found that
46% of Americans support President Bush's plan to legalize
Mexican nationals currently living here illegally, "as long as
they hold jobs that no U.S. citizen wanted to do."
George Orwell famously observed that political speech is
"designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and
to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." What else can be
said of a phrase such as "undocumented worker" which presupposes
the subject is working, and transmutes the violation of our
borders into an apparent paperwork mixup? Will we now refer to a
bank robbery as an "unauthorized withdrawal?" And what shall we
call the children of undocumented workers? Undocumented students?
Orwell forewarned us more than fifty years ago that sloppy
language begets foolish thinking -- and vice versa -- and it's as
true today as ever. Purposely misleading expressions such as
"work Americans won't do" are solid proof that big lies still fit
neatly into short phrases.
It's time we banished them.
About the Author
Mr. Salientian is a regular contributor to PHXnews.com. You can read more of his articles on politics, economics, trade and immigration at HotFrog.org.
Written by: G. Salientian
Friday, September 01, 2006
Advising on the most up-to-date advice with reference to immigration laws.
Advising on the most up-to-date advice with reference to immigration laws.: "When you are trying to find better-quality information about immigration laws, you'll find it easier said than done extricating superior advice from ill-advised immigration laws suggestions and advice so it is important to know ways of judging the information you are offered.
Here's a few pieces of advice which we believe you should use when you're seeking information about immigration laws. Understand that the guidance we offer you is only pertinent to web based information about immigration laws. We do not give you any guidance or advice for researching in 'real world' situations.
An excellent piece of advice to follow when you are presented with information and suggestions on a immigration laws web is to research who is behind the website. This may show you who owns the site immigration laws authority The quickest way to work out who owns the immigration laws website is to look on the 'contact' page or 'about this site' information.
All decent sites providing information on immigration laws, will nearly always have a 'contact', or an 'about', page which will list the site owner's details. The details should tell you some advice about the owner's necessary expertise. This permits you to make an informed assessment about the webmaster's depth of experience, to provide advice to you regarding immigration laws.
About the author:
Tom Brown is the webmaster at data-info-broadcast.info
Written by: Tom Brown"
Here's a few pieces of advice which we believe you should use when you're seeking information about immigration laws. Understand that the guidance we offer you is only pertinent to web based information about immigration laws. We do not give you any guidance or advice for researching in 'real world' situations.
An excellent piece of advice to follow when you are presented with information and suggestions on a immigration laws web is to research who is behind the website. This may show you who owns the site immigration laws authority The quickest way to work out who owns the immigration laws website is to look on the 'contact' page or 'about this site' information.
All decent sites providing information on immigration laws, will nearly always have a 'contact', or an 'about', page which will list the site owner's details. The details should tell you some advice about the owner's necessary expertise. This permits you to make an informed assessment about the webmaster's depth of experience, to provide advice to you regarding immigration laws.
About the author:
Tom Brown is the webmaster at data-info-broadcast.info
Written by: Tom Brown"
Monday, August 28, 2006
Canada Immigration Government
"Obviously, you have given at least some thought to immigrating to Canada or you wouldn't be reading this mini course. While you probably have your own reasons for considering such a move, here are a few others to think about:
As of July 26, 2005, no occupations were classified as restricted by Canada's Citizenship and Immigration department. Restricted occupations are ones that would not count towards your Pass-Mark score, regardless of the years of experience you have with that job. Some common jobs may be restricted if the need for workers to fill them is met.
As of February 18, 2005, the current Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Joe Volpe, announced changes made to immigration procedures for the spouses and common law partners of permanent residents. Now if you are approved as a permanent resident, your spouse or common law partner of either gender can live and work with you in Canada while their immigration application is being considered.
Previously, significant others had to wait for approval before moving to Canada.
Becoming a permanent resident now means you will have less time to wait before applying for Canadian citizenship. To become a citizen, you have to have lived in the country for at least three of the four years prior to your application for citizenship.
Plus, you can become a citizen of Canada without having to give up your citizenship in your country of origin. Remember that these issues are also subject to change.
About the Author
Alex Berez is a specialist in Canadian Immigration. He helps thousands of people all over the world to achieve their dream of moving to Canada. http://www.StepByStepImmigrationCanada.com
Written by: Alex Berez"
As of July 26, 2005, no occupations were classified as restricted by Canada's Citizenship and Immigration department. Restricted occupations are ones that would not count towards your Pass-Mark score, regardless of the years of experience you have with that job. Some common jobs may be restricted if the need for workers to fill them is met.
As of February 18, 2005, the current Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Joe Volpe, announced changes made to immigration procedures for the spouses and common law partners of permanent residents. Now if you are approved as a permanent resident, your spouse or common law partner of either gender can live and work with you in Canada while their immigration application is being considered.
Previously, significant others had to wait for approval before moving to Canada.
Becoming a permanent resident now means you will have less time to wait before applying for Canadian citizenship. To become a citizen, you have to have lived in the country for at least three of the four years prior to your application for citizenship.
Plus, you can become a citizen of Canada without having to give up your citizenship in your country of origin. Remember that these issues are also subject to change.
About the Author
Alex Berez is a specialist in Canadian Immigration. He helps thousands of people all over the world to achieve their dream of moving to Canada. http://www.StepByStepImmigrationCanada.com
Written by: Alex Berez"
Saturday, August 26, 2006
Business Immigration: Good Idea Or Bad?
Business Immigration: Good Idea Or Bad?: "Canada's Business Immigration Plan is a plan started by the Canadian Government to attract experienced people with money in order to boost the Canadian economy.
Prospective immigrants must have a net worth of at least $800,000 and must make an investment of $400,000 in the Canadian economy.
There are 3 classes of Business Immigrants, each with separate eligibilty requirements.
Investors The Immigrant Investor Program (IIP) wants to find experienced business persons and their capital to Canada. The Immigrant Investors must demonstrate business experience and a legally obtained minimum net worth of CAN $800,000, and must make an investment of $400,000 in the Canadian economy. Entrepreneurs The Entrepreneur Program is searching for experienced business persons who will own and actively manage businesses in Canada that contribute to the economy and create jobs. Entrepreneurs must demonstrate business experience and a minimum legally obtained net worth of CAN $300,000, and are subject to conditions upon arrival in Canada.
Self-employed persons The Self-Employed Persons Program seeks to attract applicants who have the intention and ability to become self-employed in Canada. Self-employed persons are required to have either (a) relevant experience that will enable them to make a significant contribution to the cultural or athletic life of Canada, or (b) experience in farm management and the intention and ability to purchase and manage a farm in Canada.
The province of Quebec operates its own immigrant investor program. All investors in the Quebec program must both be destined to live in Quebec and selected by Quebec. Between 1986 to 2000 most Business Immigrants were from Hong Kong,"
Prospective immigrants must have a net worth of at least $800,000 and must make an investment of $400,000 in the Canadian economy.
There are 3 classes of Business Immigrants, each with separate eligibilty requirements.
Investors The Immigrant Investor Program (IIP) wants to find experienced business persons and their capital to Canada. The Immigrant Investors must demonstrate business experience and a legally obtained minimum net worth of CAN $800,000, and must make an investment of $400,000 in the Canadian economy. Entrepreneurs The Entrepreneur Program is searching for experienced business persons who will own and actively manage businesses in Canada that contribute to the economy and create jobs. Entrepreneurs must demonstrate business experience and a minimum legally obtained net worth of CAN $300,000, and are subject to conditions upon arrival in Canada.
Self-employed persons The Self-Employed Persons Program seeks to attract applicants who have the intention and ability to become self-employed in Canada. Self-employed persons are required to have either (a) relevant experience that will enable them to make a significant contribution to the cultural or athletic life of Canada, or (b) experience in farm management and the intention and ability to purchase and manage a farm in Canada.
The province of Quebec operates its own immigrant investor program. All investors in the Quebec program must both be destined to live in Quebec and selected by Quebec. Between 1986 to 2000 most Business Immigrants were from Hong Kong,"
Friday, August 25, 2006
Bush and Kerry Differ on Immigration Policies
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the issue of immigration had not been much discussed. Both presidential candidates know very well that illegal immigration is a hot button topic in our country, and each man is now trying to use it to his political advantage. Since the eighties the Democratic Party has, in general, supported immigrants and has been for fair and just immigration laws. However, there are those members of the party who claim that the presence of millions of undocumented immigrants undermines the bargaining power of the US born labor force. On the other side, the Republican Party traditionally has been against immigrants, but is increasingly reaching out to the Latino population. Advocates of free markets within the party have flat out called for the opening of the borders.
BUSH ON IMMIGRATION.
- Because of his policies, the Mexican border is now more secure.
- Proposed temporary guest-worker program, for up to 6 years (originally announced in Jan 2004) but is against amnesty for illegal workers.
- Claims that our southern border is more secure now than before 911, partly due to his efforts, which include:
- More than a thousand additional border control agents since he took office.
- Un-manned vehicles patrolling the US-Mexico border.
- More than a thousand additional border control agents since he took office.
KERRY ON IMMIGRATION.
- Our southern border is now more of a security risk.
- Would put illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship.
- Proposes a comprehensive immigration reform bill with four major components:
- Undocumented workers who have lived and worked in the U.S. for 5 years, pay taxes, and who are successfully screened for security purposes will be given a path to citizenship.
- Eliminate the administrative backlog and delay, which have left many families divided.
- Create a secure channel for a limited number of temporary workers to come into the United States.
- Kerry would restore legal immigrants' eligibility for health care, welfare and other government programs. (The 1996 welfare reform law made most legal immigrants, including those already in the United States for a number of years, ineligible for welfare, health care and other essential programs.)
- Undocumented workers who have lived and worked in the U.S. for 5 years, pay taxes, and who are successfully screened for security purposes will be given a path to citizenship.
Unfortunately, the reality is that little of significance will be done about immigration under either a Bush or Kerry administration. Immigration is an issue which is brought up when it is time to court voters; namely Latinos. Kerry, like Bush is also close to corporations and businesses that wish to continue their supply of cheap, exploitable labor. He speaks of a path to citizenship for hardworking undocumented immigrants, but how hard will he push for these proposals in Congress? Bush proposed a temporary worker program in Jan. of 2004 (with no plan for becoming green card holders), but nothing at all has come of it. These gestures are mostly political pandering. Democrats tend to be more immigrant friendly, but remember it was Reagan who gave undocumented workers amnesty in this country. Republicans are better, though, at fanning the flames of immigrant hate. Immigration is an issue which needs to be addressed seriously, not simply with one-liners at election time. Kerry promises more, but promises can be empty. For Bush, immigrants are to be courted for elections and also used as fodder. When the economy is not doing well, it is easy to blame illegal immigrants.
Victor Motak
For more information visit: U.S. Immigration Guide - http://www.visa2003.com/ - providing information on paths to legalized status in the United States.
Thursday, August 24, 2006
Advising on the most up-to-date advice with reference to immigration laws.When you are trying to find better-quality information about immigration laws, you'll find it easier said than done extricating superior advice from ill-advised immigration laws suggestions and advice so it is important to know ways of judging the information you are offered.
Here's a few pieces of advicewhich we believe you should use when you're seeking information about immigration laws. Understand that the guidance we offer you is only pertinent to web based information about immigration laws.We do not give you any guidance or advice for researching in 'real world' situations.
An excellent piece of advice to follow when you are presented with information and suggestions on a immigration laws web is to research who is behind the website. This may show you who owns the site immigration laws authority The quickest way to work out who owns the immigration laws website is to look on the 'contact' page or 'about this site' information.
All decent sites providing information on immigration laws, will nearly always have a 'contact', or an 'about', page which will list the site owner's details. The details should tell you some advice about the owner's necessary expertise. This permits you to make an informed assessment about the webmaster's depth of experience, to provide advice to you regarding immigration laws.
About the author:
Tom Brown is the webmaster at data-info-broadcast.info
Here's a few pieces of advicewhich we believe you should use when you're seeking information about immigration laws. Understand that the guidance we offer you is only pertinent to web based information about immigration laws.We do not give you any guidance or advice for researching in 'real world' situations.
An excellent piece of advice to follow when you are presented with information and suggestions on a immigration laws web is to research who is behind the website. This may show you who owns the site immigration laws authority The quickest way to work out who owns the immigration laws website is to look on the 'contact' page or 'about this site' information.
All decent sites providing information on immigration laws, will nearly always have a 'contact', or an 'about', page which will list the site owner's details. The details should tell you some advice about the owner's necessary expertise. This permits you to make an informed assessment about the webmaster's depth of experience, to provide advice to you regarding immigration laws.
About the author:
Tom Brown is the webmaster at data-info-broadcast.info
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Banishing Immigration Newspeak
For nearly thirty years, Michigan's Lake Superior State
University has released an annual List of Banished Words, a brief
inventory of the year's most annoyingly popular expressions, with
the recommendation they be "banished from the Queen's English for
mis-use, over-use and general uselessness."
This year, the tiresome "metrosexual" and the insufferable "bling
bling" were deservedly condemned, as were several war-inspired
entrants such as "embedded journalist" and "smoking gun." I was
disappointed that none of my three choices for this annual
dishonor made the cut, however. My nominees for banishment were:
"Guest worker program," "Matching willing workers with willing
employers," and the worst offender, "Work Americans won't do," as
in "our economy needs illegal immigrants because they do work
Americans won't do."
Combined, these three Orwellian phrases are calculated to convey
the impression that there are certain occupations so inherently
dangerous or otherwise disagreeable that we lazy, self-indulgent,
American crybabies must rely on hardy immigrant stock to roll up
their sleeves and get the job done for us. Tell that to a
Pennsylvania coal miner!
Although it's true that less glamorous jobs are frequently filled
by illegal aliens, the jobs themselves are not intrinsically
unacceptable. Rather, the ready supply of illegal labor has
resulted in many perfectly satisfactory jobs becoming
unacceptable. In short, illegal aliens will work under unsanitary
and unsafe conditions for minimum wage or even less, thereby
lowering standards, and as long as employers can fill jobs by
exploiting illegals, there will simply be no incentive to improve
wages or working conditions.
A recent piece by Nancy L. Othón and Mike Clary in the South
Florida Sun-Sentinel illustrates this principle in action with
the story of Gregorio Ruiz Aviles and Lauro Marquez Hernandez,
two young Mexican illegal alien construction workers crushed to
death in the collapse of a three-story building on which they
were working. Five other men were injured in the accident. The
Florida company which employed them was fined $2.4 million for
having no workers' compensation insurance, but according to Othón
and Clary, "five months after the deaths of Ruiz and Marquez, few
public officials, employers, workers and immigrant advocates
express much hope that change would come soon in an industry
where undocumented workers willingly take any job they can get."
Worse still, employers who play by the rules are easily underbid
by their unscrupulous rivals, and the downward pressure on wages
and safety intensifies. And this phenomenon is certain to worsen
-- not lessen -- under any program which would legalize the
process. Why? Because a "documented" worker is easier to deport,
and will therefore be more likely to do "work Americans won't do"
to avoid unemployment and ineligibility. A guest worker program
will therefore simply institutionalize the current gray market
for employees who will tolerate the intolerable.
It's a tenuous doctrine, that American workers are so expensive
that even American companies can't afford them, and the plan to
extricate ourselves from this invented predicament by pinning our
hopes on the newly legendary Mexican work ethic is flimsier
still. And yet, there is some evidence that muddleheaded
Americans are being persuaded by the hypnotic repetition of
immigration Newspeak issuing from the White House, the Congress,
and the major news media. A February 2004 Gallup Poll found that
46% of Americans support President Bush's plan to legalize
Mexican nationals currently living here illegally, "as long as
they hold jobs that no U.S. citizen wanted to do."
George Orwell famously observed that political speech is
"designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and
to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." What else can be
said of a phrase such as "undocumented worker" which presupposes
the subject is working, and transmutes the violation of our
borders into an apparent paperwork mixup? Will we now refer to a
bank robbery as an "unauthorized withdrawal?" And what shall we
call the children of undocumented workers? Undocumented students?
Orwell forewarned us more than fifty years ago that sloppy
language begets foolish thinking -- and vice versa -- and it's as
true today as ever. Purposely misleading expressions such as
"work Americans won't do" are solid proof that big lies still fit
neatly into short phrases.
It's time we banished them.
University has released an annual List of Banished Words, a brief
inventory of the year's most annoyingly popular expressions, with
the recommendation they be "banished from the Queen's English for
mis-use, over-use and general uselessness."
This year, the tiresome "metrosexual" and the insufferable "bling
bling" were deservedly condemned, as were several war-inspired
entrants such as "embedded journalist" and "smoking gun." I was
disappointed that none of my three choices for this annual
dishonor made the cut, however. My nominees for banishment were:
"Guest worker program," "Matching willing workers with willing
employers," and the worst offender, "Work Americans won't do," as
in "our economy needs illegal immigrants because they do work
Americans won't do."
Combined, these three Orwellian phrases are calculated to convey
the impression that there are certain occupations so inherently
dangerous or otherwise disagreeable that we lazy, self-indulgent,
American crybabies must rely on hardy immigrant stock to roll up
their sleeves and get the job done for us. Tell that to a
Pennsylvania coal miner!
Although it's true that less glamorous jobs are frequently filled
by illegal aliens, the jobs themselves are not intrinsically
unacceptable. Rather, the ready supply of illegal labor has
resulted in many perfectly satisfactory jobs becoming
unacceptable. In short, illegal aliens will work under unsanitary
and unsafe conditions for minimum wage or even less, thereby
lowering standards, and as long as employers can fill jobs by
exploiting illegals, there will simply be no incentive to improve
wages or working conditions.
A recent piece by Nancy L. Othón and Mike Clary in the South
Florida Sun-Sentinel illustrates this principle in action with
the story of Gregorio Ruiz Aviles and Lauro Marquez Hernandez,
two young Mexican illegal alien construction workers crushed to
death in the collapse of a three-story building on which they
were working. Five other men were injured in the accident. The
Florida company which employed them was fined $2.4 million for
having no workers' compensation insurance, but according to Othón
and Clary, "five months after the deaths of Ruiz and Marquez, few
public officials, employers, workers and immigrant advocates
express much hope that change would come soon in an industry
where undocumented workers willingly take any job they can get."
Worse still, employers who play by the rules are easily underbid
by their unscrupulous rivals, and the downward pressure on wages
and safety intensifies. And this phenomenon is certain to worsen
-- not lessen -- under any program which would legalize the
process. Why? Because a "documented" worker is easier to deport,
and will therefore be more likely to do "work Americans won't do"
to avoid unemployment and ineligibility. A guest worker program
will therefore simply institutionalize the current gray market
for employees who will tolerate the intolerable.
It's a tenuous doctrine, that American workers are so expensive
that even American companies can't afford them, and the plan to
extricate ourselves from this invented predicament by pinning our
hopes on the newly legendary Mexican work ethic is flimsier
still. And yet, there is some evidence that muddleheaded
Americans are being persuaded by the hypnotic repetition of
immigration Newspeak issuing from the White House, the Congress,
and the major news media. A February 2004 Gallup Poll found that
46% of Americans support President Bush's plan to legalize
Mexican nationals currently living here illegally, "as long as
they hold jobs that no U.S. citizen wanted to do."
George Orwell famously observed that political speech is
"designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and
to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." What else can be
said of a phrase such as "undocumented worker" which presupposes
the subject is working, and transmutes the violation of our
borders into an apparent paperwork mixup? Will we now refer to a
bank robbery as an "unauthorized withdrawal?" And what shall we
call the children of undocumented workers? Undocumented students?
Orwell forewarned us more than fifty years ago that sloppy
language begets foolish thinking -- and vice versa -- and it's as
true today as ever. Purposely misleading expressions such as
"work Americans won't do" are solid proof that big lies still fit
neatly into short phrases.
It's time we banished them.
About the Author
Mr. Salientian is a regular contributor to PHXnews.com. You can read more of his articles on politics, economics, trade and immigration at HotFrog.org
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)